The Blog

Build with the latest DeepSeek models

DeepSeek currently offers two LLM access points via its API: deepseek-chat and deepseek-reasoner. According to the official documentation, both currently correspond to DeepSeek-V3.2 with a 128K context window; deepseek-chat stands for Non-Thinking mode, deepseek-reasoner for Thinking mode. The API is OpenAI-compatible and supports, among other things, JSON Output, Tool Calls, Chat Prefix Completion, and, in the case of deepseek-chat, additionally FIM Completion.
DeepSeek API

LLM "Build with the latest DeepSeek models"

(0)

Your review

Click the stars to start your review.

4.0/10 KIFOX Score – Limited

Location: China No verified official full address data available on the DeepSeek website/policy

Chatbot Function calls AI agents AI inference LLM API open-source model Programming Reasoning model Language model Text generation
Other Token-based API usage Billing based on input, output, and cache-hit/cache-miss tokens.

deepseek-v4-flash Faster, more efficient model with Thinking and Non-Thinking mode, 1M context, JSON output, tool calls, and chat prefix completion.

deepseek-v4-pro More powerful model for more complex reasoning, coding, agents, and long contexts; also supports 1M context, JSON output, and tool calls.

OpenAI-/Anthropic-compatible API Usage via an OpenAI-compatible base URL or an Anthropic-compatible endpoint; suitable for existing SDKs and agent tools.

Open Weights / Self-hosting path DeepSeek-V4 was released as an open-weights family; self-hosting requires your own infrastructure and should be considered separately from the official API.
Target audienceAssessment
Developers / technical teamsVery suitable – for cost-efficient chat, coding, reasoning, and agent workflows.
SaaS startups / product teamsSuitable – especially if OpenAI-/Anthropic-compatible API formats and low model costs are important.
Coding and agent teamsVery suitable – because of Thinking/Non-Thinking modes, Tool Calls, JSON Output, FIM, and a very large context.
SMEs with a cost focusSuitable – if technical integration is in place and no sensitive personal data is processed.
EU companies with strict compliance requirementsRather critical – due to data processing and storage in China as well as the unclear situation regarding DPA/SCC/EU data residency.

Calculate tokens and costs with the KIFOX Tokenizer

Hosting & Data

✅ = well covered ⚠️ = partial / indirect ❓ = not available / unclear
?

1) On-prem / local hosting
Meaning: The company operates the solution on its own hardware or within its own infrastructure. In the strictest sense, not only the application runs locally, but ideally the model as well.

2) Private cloud / data center
Meaning: The solution runs in a dedicated or more clearly separated cloud environment, often with a hosting provider or hyperscaler, but in a German data center or in a particularly controlled environment.

3) EU SaaS / managed
Meaning: The provider operates the solution itself as a service. The company uses the tool as a ready-made cloud service, ideally with EU data residency.

4) Hybrid
Meaning: One part of the processing remains internal / local / in a private cloud, while another part runs in an external cloud or EU SaaS.

5) AVV / DPA
Meaning: This is the data processing agreement or Data Processing Addendum. It governs that the provider processes personal data on behalf of the customer and is bound by the customer's instructions.

6) No training
Meaning: The provider does not use your prompts, uploads, attachments, chat histories, or outputs for training or improving the general model — ideally excluded by contract.

7) Open-source / transparency path
Meaning: There is a path toward greater technical transparency and sovereignty, for example through:
- open models
- documented components
- self-hostable parts
- traceable architecture
- export / switching options

✅ = well covered ⚠️ = partial / indirect ❓ = not available / unclear
On-prem / local hosting
Private cloud / data center
EU SaaS / Managed
Hybrid
DPA / AVV
No training on customer data
Open source / transparency path ⚠️

On-prem / local hosting: indirect / not available

For the DeepSeek API service in question, the website does not describe any on-premises, local, or self-hostable deployment. The documentation describes an API endpoint operated by DeepSeek.

Private Cloud / Data Center: Unclear

The website provides no information on dedicated private cloud, single-tenant, or specifically designated EU/EEA data center options. A “capacity expansion request” is documented, but it provides no details regarding hosting isolation or data residency.

EU SaaS / Managed: unclear

A managed SaaS/API service is clearly documented, but the website lacks information on EU/EEA data residency or EU/EEA data centers. Therefore, there is no evidence that this constitutes EU SaaS in the required sense.

Hybrid: Indirect / Not Available

The website does not describe a hybrid model in which parts of the processing take place internally, locally, or in a private cloud, while other parts run via DeepSeek. Only the use of the externally operated API service is documented.

T&C / DPA: unclear

No TOS/DPA is listed on the website. There is merely a reference to the “Terms of Service” and a note in the FAQ stating that cooperation agreements can be requested offline if needed; however, an explicit AVV/DPA for EU/EEA customers is not listed on the website.

No Training: Unclear

No clear statement was found on the website indicating that prompts, uploads, chat histories, or outputs are not used to train general models. Likewise, no documented opt-out from AI training was found on the website.

Open Source / Transparency Path: Partial

The website indirectly indicates a transparency/open-source path: Several news articles mention open weights or open-source releases of the models, and the API documentation specifies an MIT license for the API documentation. However, the website does not describe a specific self-hostable path for the API service itself under consideration here.

Data Processing

The website describes a centrally operated API service under “https://api.deepseek.com.” Documented features include “user_id”-based isolation for privacy management and context caching on disk. According to the website, cache entries for each user are logically isolated from one another, and unused entries are automatically deleted. At the same time, users are advised not to store any privacy-sensitive information in the ‘user_id’. No information regarding specific server locations, EU/EEA data residency, subprocessors, or a training opt-out was found on the website.

Conclusion

Based on the documentation available on the provider’s domain, DeepSeek API cannot currently be clearly demonstrated as GDPR-compliant for an EU/EEA tool directory. There are some technical privacy notes, but the evidence regarding data location, data processing, subprocessors, training use, and certifications—which is central to an EU/EEA assessment—is either missing from the website or cannot be found there.

Sources

On-prem / local hosting
Private cloud / data center
EU SaaS / Managed
Hybrid
DPA / AVV
No training on customer data
Open source / transparency path ⚠️

On-prem / local hosting: indirect / not available

For the DeepSeek API service in question, the website does not describe any on-premises, local, or self-hostable deployment. The documentation describes an API endpoint operated by DeepSeek.

Private Cloud / Data Center: Unclear

The website provides no information on dedicated private cloud, single-tenant, or specifically designated EU/EEA data center options. A “capacity expansion request” is documented, but it provides no details regarding hosting isolation or data residency.

EU SaaS / Managed: unclear

A managed SaaS/API service is clearly documented, but the website lacks information on EU/EEA data residency or EU/EEA data centers. Therefore, there is no evidence that this constitutes EU SaaS in the required sense.

Hybrid: Indirect / Not Available

The website does not describe a hybrid model in which parts of the processing take place internally, locally, or in a private cloud, while other parts run via DeepSeek. Only the use of the externally operated API service is documented.

T&C / DPA: unclear

No TOS/DPA is listed on the website. There is merely a reference to the “Terms of Service” and a note in the FAQ stating that cooperation agreements can be requested offline if needed; however, an explicit AVV/DPA for EU/EEA customers is not listed on the website.

No Training: Unclear

No clear statement was found on the website indicating that prompts, uploads, chat histories, or outputs are not used to train general models. Likewise, no documented opt-out from AI training was found on the website.

Open Source / Transparency Path: Partial

The website indirectly indicates a transparency/open-source path: Several news articles mention open weights or open-source releases of the models, and the API documentation specifies an MIT license for the API documentation. However, the website does not describe a specific self-hostable path for the API service itself under consideration here.

Data Processing

The website describes a centrally operated API service under “https://api.deepseek.com.” Documented features include “user_id”-based isolation for privacy management and context caching on disk. According to the website, cache entries for each user are logically isolated from one another, and unused entries are automatically deleted. At the same time, users are advised not to store any privacy-sensitive information in the ‘user_id’. No information regarding specific server locations, EU/EEA data residency, subprocessors, or a training opt-out was found on the website.

Conclusion

Based on the documentation available on the provider’s domain, DeepSeek API cannot currently be clearly demonstrated as GDPR-compliant for an EU/EEA tool directory. There are some technical privacy notes, but the evidence regarding data location, data processing, subprocessors, training use, and certifications—which is central to an EU/EEA assessment—is either missing from the website or cannot be found there.

Sources

Strengths & weaknesses at a glance

Strengths Weaknesses
- Very affordable API prices in the official pricing. - The current API portfolio is narrow: officially only two model IDs.
- Well suited for coding, reasoning, tool use, and agentic workflows. - Critical for EU/GDPR-sensitive use, because according to its Privacy Policy, DeepSeek processes and stores personal data directly in the People's Republic of China.
- OpenAI-compatible API, which makes integrations easier. - According to its Privacy Policy, DeepSeek generally also uses personal data to improve the services and to train/optimize the technology; an opt-out is provided, but it is not the default.
- Open-source/MIT license strategy for the model weights. - No clearly publicly documented classic enterprise tiers; according to the FAQ, there are no tiered plans and rate limits are dynamic.
- According to the terms, relatively extensive usage rights for outputs. - DeepSeek itself points out that outputs may be erroneous and should not be considered professional advice.

Data last updated: 17. April 2026

Reviews

0 reviews in total

(0)
5★ 0.0%
4★ 0.0%
3★ 0.0%
2★ 0.0%
1★ 0.0%

There are no confirmed reviews for this tool yet.