The Blog

“Automate your work.”

Make is a visual no-code/low-code automation platform for integrations, workflows, and increasingly also agentic AI processes.

Companies can use it to connect data and actions across 3,000+ apps, automate API-based processes, and incorporate AI features such as AI Agents, AI Toolkit, AI Content Extractor, AI Web Search, and MCP servers into scenarios. The product addresses both simple app automations and more complex enterprise workflows with team, governance, and hybrid connectivity.
Make

Automate your work

(0)

Your review

Click the stars to start your review.

7.3/10 KIFOX Score – Good

Location: USA Celonis, Inc., One World Trade Center, 87th Floor, New York, NY 10007, USA.

Automation Data Analysis AI agents
Free Monthly credits, visual no-code workflow builder, 3,000+ apps, router & filter, support, and a longer minimum interval. Subscription Core Everything in Free plus unlimited active scenarios, more granular scheduling, higher data limits, and the Make API.

Pro Everything in Core plus Priority Scenario Execution, Custom Variables, and Full-Text Execution Log Search.

Teams Everything in Pro plus Teams, team roles, and sharing of scenario templates.
Other Enterprise Custom Functions Support, Enterprise App Integrations, 24/7 Enterprise Support, Value Engineering, Overage Protection, and Advanced Security.

Credits / AI Agents Credit-based usage for scenarios and AI automation; scope of features varies by plan.

Target audience

Make is aimed at a broad spectrum: from individual users who want to build simple app automations via drag-and-drop to teams and large enterprises building cross-functional integration and AI landscapes. Officially, Make addresses areas including marketing, sales, operations, customer experience, finance, IT, HR, and workplace productivity. For enterprise users, Make additionally positions itself as a platform for scalable, secure, and governance-ready automation.

Outstanding features

Particularly noteworthy are the visual scenario modeling, the large app library, and the more recent integration of AI with traditional automation. Under “Make + AI,” Make lists several building blocks: AI Applications, MCP Server, AI Content Extractor, AI Web Search (beta), AI Agents, and AI Toolkit. The new AI Agents are created directly in the builder and, according to Make, offer traceable execution via a Reasoning Panel, which improves debugging and transparency compared to typical black-box agents.

Key application areas

The most important areas include app integrations, data and process synchronization, lead and CRM automation, email and marketing workflows, support triage, reporting, document extraction, and AI-supported decision logic. Make also cites specific agent examples such as support ticket triage, sales outreach, content marketing, market research, and candidate screening. This means the tool covers both classic BPA scenarios and newer agentic use cases.

Usage & notes

Operation is primarily handled via the visual Scenario Builder. For AI functions, one important point is that AI Agents are officially in Open Beta, and pricing may change. The billing model is based on credits; with AI functions, complexity increases because, in addition to operations, tokens, file sizes, pages, or runtimes may also be factored in. From a data protection perspective, particular attention should be paid to the selected hosting region, the enabled AI services, and the privacy policies of the connected third-party providers.

Target audienceAssessment
Self-employed / FreelancersHighly suitable – for recurring workflows, marketing, CRM, data synchronization, and AI automation.
SMEsHighly suitable – visual automation across many apps, APIs, and data sources.
Agencies / Automation expertsHighly suitable – more complex scenarios, routers, filters, API workflows, and templates.
Enterprise teamsSuitable – Enterprise offers more security, support, integrations, and governance.
Non-technical beginnersConditionally suitable – easier than code, but more complex than very simple Zapier workflows.

Hosting & Data

✅ = well covered ⚠️ = partial / indirect ❓ = not available / unclear
?

1) On-prem / local hosting
Meaning: The company operates the solution on its own hardware or within its own infrastructure. In the strictest sense, not only the application runs locally, but ideally the model as well.

2) Private cloud / data center
Meaning: The solution runs in a dedicated or more clearly separated cloud environment, often with a hosting provider or hyperscaler, but in a German data center or in a particularly controlled environment.

3) EU SaaS / managed
Meaning: The provider operates the solution itself as a service. The company uses the tool as a ready-made cloud service, ideally with EU data residency.

4) Hybrid
Meaning: One part of the processing remains internal / local / in a private cloud, while another part runs in an external cloud or EU SaaS.

5) AVV / DPA
Meaning: This is the data processing agreement or Data Processing Addendum. It governs that the provider processes personal data on behalf of the customer and is bound by the customer's instructions.

6) No training
Meaning: The provider does not use your prompts, uploads, attachments, chat histories, or outputs for training or improving the general model — ideally excluded by contract.

7) Open-source / transparency path
Meaning: There is a path toward greater technical transparency and sovereignty, for example through:
- open models
- documented components
- self-hostable parts
- traceable architecture
- export / switching options

✅ = well covered ⚠️ = partial / indirect ❓ = not available / unclear
On-prem / local hosting
Private cloud / data center ⚠️
EU SaaS / Managed
Hybrid
DPA / AVV
No training on customer data ⚠️
Open source / transparency path

On-prem / local hosting: indirect / not available

No on-premises, local, or self-hosted deployment of Make was found on the website.

Private Cloud / Data Center: Partially

The security page mentions a separately managed AWS environment for Enterprise, isolated from self-service cloud customers. This suggests a segregated environment, but does not clearly indicate a customer-owned, dedicated private cloud with full freedom of location and operation.

EU SaaS / Managed: Covered

The Help Center documentation on make.com lists a selectable data center region called “European Union (EU)” for organizations, where data is stored and processed. The list of subprocessors specifies AWS hosting in Ireland or Germany for European customers.

Hybrid: unclear

No clearly described hybrid operating model was found on the website in which part of the processing runs internally or on private infrastructure and another part runs as a managed service.

DPA: Covered

A DPA/AVV is published on the website as a PDF. It describes Make as a processor acting on behalf of the customer and stipulates that processing is subject to the customer’s documented instructions.

No Training: Partially

The Privacy Notice explicitly states only that Google Workspace APIs are not used to develop, improve, or train generalized AI/ML models. A general, product-wide commitment that prompts, uploads, or outputs from all AI features are never used for model training was not found on the website.

Open Source / Transparency Path: Indirect / Not Available

No clear information regarding open-source components, open models, or self-hostable core components was found on the website. A transparency pathway exists, if at all, only indirectly through contractual documents, Terms of Service (TOS), and data export/deletion policies, but not as an open-source or sovereignty model.

Data Processing

The website describes Make as a managed cloud service. According to the Help Center, organizations can select the data center region, including “European Union (EU),” with this region determining the storage and processing of the organization’s data. For Enterprise, Make specifies a separately managed AWS environment. The DPA, TOMs, and the list of subprocessors are published on the website. For international transfers, Make refers to DPF and SCCs. No information regarding on-premises or local hosting was found on the website.

Conclusion

For users in the EU/EEA, Make is best classified—according to its own website—as an EU SaaS offering with contractual and organizational safeguards, rather than as a fully independent on-premises solution. Positive aspects include the choice of an EU region, the DPA/AVV, TOMs, the list of subprocessors, and certifications. Limitations remain due to U.S. connections, international transfers, and the use of AI data for training, which is not clearly and generally excluded on the website. Overall, its use within the EU/EEA is conditionally GDPR-compliant, provided that the EU region is selected, the DPA is concluded, and the specific data flows are carefully reviewed.

Sources

On-prem / local hosting
Private cloud / data center ⚠️
EU SaaS / Managed
Hybrid
DPA / AVV
No training on customer data ⚠️
Open source / transparency path

On-prem / local hosting: indirect / not available

No on-premises, local, or self-hosted deployment of Make was found on the website.

Private Cloud / Data Center: Partially

The security page mentions a separately managed AWS environment for Enterprise, isolated from self-service cloud customers. This suggests a segregated environment, but does not clearly indicate a customer-owned, dedicated private cloud with full freedom of location and operation.

EU SaaS / Managed: Covered

The Help Center documentation on make.com lists a selectable data center region called “European Union (EU)” for organizations, where data is stored and processed. The list of subprocessors specifies AWS hosting in Ireland or Germany for European customers.

Hybrid: unclear

No clearly described hybrid operating model was found on the website in which part of the processing runs internally or on private infrastructure and another part runs as a managed service.

DPA: Covered

A DPA/AVV is published on the website as a PDF. It describes Make as a processor acting on behalf of the customer and stipulates that processing is subject to the customer’s documented instructions.

No Training: Partially

The Privacy Notice explicitly states only that Google Workspace APIs are not used to develop, improve, or train generalized AI/ML models. A general, product-wide commitment that prompts, uploads, or outputs from all AI features are never used for model training was not found on the website.

Open Source / Transparency Path: Indirect / Not Available

No clear information regarding open-source components, open models, or self-hostable core components was found on the website. A transparency pathway exists, if at all, only indirectly through contractual documents, Terms of Service (TOS), and data export/deletion policies, but not as an open-source or sovereignty model.

Data Processing

The website describes Make as a managed cloud service. According to the Help Center, organizations can select the data center region, including “European Union (EU),” with this region determining the storage and processing of the organization’s data. For Enterprise, Make specifies a separately managed AWS environment. The DPA, TOMs, and the list of subprocessors are published on the website. For international transfers, Make refers to DPF and SCCs. No information regarding on-premises or local hosting was found on the website.

Conclusion

For users in the EU/EEA, Make is best classified—according to its own website—as an EU SaaS offering with contractual and organizational safeguards, rather than as a fully independent on-premises solution. Positive aspects include the choice of an EU region, the DPA/AVV, TOMs, the list of subprocessors, and certifications. Limitations remain due to U.S. connections, international transfers, and the use of AI data for training, which is not clearly and generally excluded on the website. Overall, its use within the EU/EEA is conditionally GDPR-compliant, provided that the EU region is selected, the DPA is concluded, and the specific data flows are carefully reviewed.

Sources

Strengths & weaknesses at a glance

Strengths Weaknesses
– Very strong visual workflow modeling without the requirement for in-house backend development. – The pricing model is credit-based; for AI and advanced features, consumption can fluctuate dynamically based on operations, tokens, pages, file size, or runtime, which makes cost estimation more difficult.
– 3,000+ standard apps and API access for broad integration coverage. – The free tier is significantly limited for production use, including 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios, and a 15-minute interval.
– AI features are not just add-ons, but can be integrated directly into scenarios. – According to the Help Center, the On-Prem Agent is an Enterprise feature and currently supports only the HTTP Agent approach, i.e. not full self-hosting of the entire platform.
– Enterprise expansion with team roles, templates, enterprise apps, on-prem agent, and advanced security features. – The new AI Agents are officially in Open Beta; functionality and pricing may change.
– Official privacy/compliance documentation is published comparatively extensively. – According to the MSA, the customer remains responsible for third-party services and their data protection/terms of use.

Data last updated: 25. April 2026

Reviews

0 reviews in total

(0)
5★ 0.0%
4★ 0.0%
3★ 0.0%
2★ 0.0%
1★ 0.0%

There are no confirmed reviews for this tool yet.